On Friday 28 September 2012 09:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
2) The downstream driver is significaly different from the current
code. I believe a patch to re-add the downstream driver (with
appropriate cleanup) will be much simpler to review if it's a new
file rather than randomly interspered with essentially unrelated
existing code.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Mark,
If this can be taken through the SPI tree for 3.7 that'd be great. If
it needs to be deferred to 3.8, we will need to start talking dependencies,
since I'd like to take a patch through the Tegra tree to delete mach/dma.h
in 3.8.
---
Acked by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
It will be great if this goes in k3.7 so that we can post the new driver
on K3.8.
Definitely it will easy to review along with multiple bug fixes which is
done in driver for interfacing different devices like camera/ touch etc.
Having all these changes on top of existing one will create more than 10
patches and complicate the review. Also after these many patches, the
new driver will be look different than the existing one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
