> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:56AM +0800, Bill Huang wrote: > > nvpublic > > > So what you're asking for is a feature to do what > > > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP does, but without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP enabled? > > > > Yeah pretty much, I'm actually asking should we take care of this > > since maybe not all platforms will have this config enabled? > > > > > > Why not just ensure that CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP is enabled if your > > > platform requires that the lowest CPU number be the CPU dealing with reboot? > > > > Someday we will have it enabled, but before that we'll hit the issue, > > so you don't think this should be taken care of? Thanks. > > Well, just enable CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP then - it'll be far better than trying to implement something in > the ARM code, especially as sysrq can be used for poweroff/reboot etc (which will run from atomic > contexts where you can't switch to another CPU.) > > What you're asking for will make these callbacks fragile for other platforms. OK, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
