Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:38:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This is why __devinit data will only be discarded when this is not
> > > possible.
> 
> > That's exactly my point. But I seem to have miserably failed to get that
> > across. =)
> 
> We must be talking at cross purposes then.  What I'm saying is that the
> framework shouldn't rely on platform data and should assume that the
> kernel might be configured so it can be discarded (by copying most
> likely).

Yes. I think this should be solved by the power_seq_build() function
which uses the platform data description of the sequence and builds it
into something for internal use that doesn't rely on anything in the
platform data.

Thierry

Attachment: pgpVnnRkQomlf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux