On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 11:33 +0800, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:04:33 +0200 > markz <markz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:42 +0800, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:58:27 +0200 > > > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:26:39PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > > > > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2012-January/003531.html > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any plan to merge the above "IOMMU: Make IOMMU-API ready > > > > > for GART-like hardware"? > > > > > > > > > > Tegra DRM seems to need that feature eventually. > > > > > > > > I just rebased and updated the patch-set. A new version is sent out. If > > > > no major objections come up I queue it for the next merge window. > > > > > > Thank you for your prompt action. This would help us a lot. > > > > That's great. So Hiroshi-san, about your patch: > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2012-January/003531.html > > , what is your plan to merge this? > > That's also under review along with the framework as below: > > [PATCH 6/7] iommu/tegra: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2012-July/004432.html > > > After Joerg's patch and yours are merged into linux-next, I can submit > > my drm patch into review process. > > You can also send them now for early review with some note mentioning > that your patches depend on the above "[PATCH 6/7] iommu/tegra: > Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute" in the commit log. Thank you. I merged this patch set locally but seems it has problems: The requirement of the drm driver is: It needs a parameter named "base" while calling function "arm_iommu_create_mapping" to reserve a block of iova from GART/SMMU. This patch set defines function "iommu_domain_get_attr" & "iommu_domain_set_attr", but drm driver can't use them: 1. These 2 functions need a iommu_domain param which means the iommu_domain should be created before calling them. But the iommu_domain is created in function "arm_iommu_create_mapping". 2. It's not a good practice to make drm driver calls iommu apis directly. Actually, I'm curious that why function "arm_iommu_create_mapping" needs this "base" param. AIUI, drm driver just needs to tell IOMMU the size of the iova address to reserve, then the base address can be checked out in a lot of ways. For example: 1. Via "dma_map_sg" interface -- dma_map_sg defines we can check out the mapped iova address from "dma_address" member in scatterlist structure. 2. Use this iommu get/set attr interface. Of course, we need some dma mapping api wrappers on them. Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html