Re: [v2 1/1] iommu/tegra: smmu: Fix unsleepable memory allocation at alloc_pdir()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/28/2012 12:35 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:57:18 +0200:
>> On 06/28/2012 04:51 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>>> alloc_pdir() is called from smmu_iommu_domain_init() with spin_lock
>>> held. memory allocations in alloc_pdir() had to be
>>> atomic/unsleepable. Instead of converting into atomic allocation, this
>>> patch once releases a lock, do the allocation, hold the lock again and
>>> then see if it's raced or not in order to avoid introducing mutex.

>>> +static int alloc_pdir(struct smmu_as *as, unsigned long *flags)
>>
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, *flags);
>>> +	cnt = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev,
>>> +			   sizeof(cnt[0]) * SMMU_PDIR_COUNT, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_DMA);
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, *flags);
>>> +
>>> +	if (as->pdir_page) {
>>> +		/* We raced, free the redundant */
>>> +		err = -ENODEV;
>>> +		goto err_out;
>>>  	}
>>
>> Is that really an error; it just means that something else allocated the
>> same pdir already. Since the top of the function does:
>>
>>  	if (as->pdir_page)
>>  		return 0;
>>
>> I'd expect to s/err = -ENODEV/err = 0/ inside that if condition that I
>> quoted above, but still of cause "goto err_out" to free the now unneeded
>> allocations.
>>
>> Aside from that, I think this looks reasonable.
> 
> I think that, in the case of race condition, the one which comes
> later, should retry with the another ASID, which is incremented as
> below. So I modified that the latter one returns with -EAGAIN, and try
> with another ASID.
> 
> The complete patch follows this mail.

incremental rather than complete, right?

> 
> Changes:
> 	Modified drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> index ec656ec..f2c18fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int alloc_pdir(struct smmu_as *as, unsigned long *flags)
>  
>  	if (as->pdir_page) {
>  		/* We raced, free the redundant */
> -		err = -ENODEV;
> +		err = -EAGAIN;
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -799,8 +799,15 @@ static int smmu_iommu_domain_init(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&tmp->lock, flags);
>  		if (!tmp->pdir_page) {
> -			as = tmp;
> -			goto found;
> +			int err;
> +
> +			err = alloc_pdir(tmp, &flags);
> +			if (!err) {
> +				as = tmp;
> +				goto found;
> +			}
> +			if (err == -EAGAIN)
> +				continue;

That loop is going to continue anyway, since that code is right at the
end of the loop. Don't you want to replace that if block with:

if (err != -EAGAIN)
    goto err_alloc_pdir;

?

Also, the first thinig that alloc_pdir does is:

        if (as->pdir_page)
                return 0;

It seems that should be removed completely, right? Since having the
pdir_page already allocated is an error.

>  		}
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tmp->lock, flags);
>  	}
> @@ -808,9 +815,6 @@ static int smmu_iommu_domain_init(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  
>  found:
> -	if (alloc_pdir(as, &flags) < 0)
> -		goto err_alloc_pdir;
> -
>  	spin_lock(&smmu->lock);
>  
>  	/* Update PDIR register */
> @@ -826,10 +830,6 @@ found:
>  
>  	dev_dbg(smmu->dev, "smmu_as@%p\n", as);
>  	return 0;
> -
> -err_alloc_pdir:
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, flags);
> -	return -ENODEV;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux