On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:35:46PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> So I think this sm0 (and the sm1) entry might actually be >> correct; sm0 feeds vdd_core and sm1 feeds vdd_cpu. These rails >> have DVFS and hence the voltage can vary. I guess I should change >> the regulator-name in these cases to something more useful than >> the very first signal name on the schematics too. > > Even if they feed these supplies are they capable of varying on > this board if they're shared with other things? This is one of the > common issues with constraints... But generally if the supply > covers more than one thing the idiomatic thing is to list them all > separated by / or something. These two supplies aren't shared, it's just that the signal on the schematic ends up being named different things in different places; on the regulator page it's named vdd_sm0, but on some other page it gets renamed vdd_core. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
