* Stephen Warren wrote: > I just posted a patch which causes U-Boot to define some variables > describing which board you're running on: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-May/124556.html > > In particular, see the description of that first patch for motivation > re: U-Boot scripts. > > The one issue here is that the U-Boot SoC name for Tegra20 is tegra2 > (hence it will define board_soc=tegra2), whereas the kernel's device > tree files are all tegra-*.dts not tegra2-*.dts. > > I propose we fix this by: > > a) In the kernel, renaming tegra*-${board}.dts to tegra20-${board}.dts > (or tegra30-${board}.dts). This appears to better match what most other > ARM sub-arches are doing anyway. > > b) In U-Boot, rename the tegra2 support to tegra20 so that U-Boot ends > up setting board_soc=tegra20, so this matches the .dts/.dtb filenames. > This would involve renaming arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/ to > ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/ and editing boards.cfg to match, and > possibly other related changes. > > This sounds like churn, but I think we could easily fold this into > Allen's series that moves the tegra2 directory in order to put it in a > common place for separate SPL/non-SPL builds to avoid doing this kind of > thing multiple times. > > Does anyone think this is a good/bad/... idea? Thanks. I like it. It's better to have the names consistent. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpBLZkp_K10_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
