Re: moving Tegra30 to the common clock framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:04:41PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:13:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> 
> > Ok. Thanks. One more question. We have some clocks with special features
> > such as request lines for clock outputs, delays for clocks recovered from
> > an external source or several divisors which are used based on the state
> > of the module which is served by the clock (eg. an idle divisor and an active
> > divisor). How should these be modelled?
> 
> For the idle/active divisors could they be represented as separate
> clocks?

I guess that might be possible. Need to look into it.

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux