On Friday 27 April 2012, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > What about having this driver under "drivers/amba"? > > If other similiar drivers are coming up, it's easy to find rather than > having this arch/arm/mach-*. There may be some possibility of > generalization later, then. Also it meets the requirement of no > "struct xxxx_driver" under arch/arm. Arnd? I'm fine with either drivers/amba (arguing that it's for a specific amba bus even if it's highly platform specific) or arch/arm/mach-tegra (arguing that it's platform code and not actually a device driver even if it appears like one). If Russell doesn't mind having it in drivers/amba, I'd say we should go for that. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
