Hi,
I'm working on getting DT support for PCIe on Tegra working. The Tegra PCIe
controller needs a specific voltage supplied by a regulator on the board that
I use (Harmony-compatible), so what I did was add DT support for the PMU
(tps6586x) to provide the corresponding regulator:
pmu: tps6586x@34 {
[...]
regulators {
...
ldo0_reg: ldo0 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
};
};
[...]
};
Within the device node of the PCIe controller, I reference the ldo0 regulator
like so:
pcie@80000000 {
pex-clk-supply = <&ldo0_reg>;
};
This all works well, except there seems to be no API to obtain a regulator
from the DT phandle. I'm wondering whether this is because nobody has had any
use for it or whether I'm using it wrongly.
I could possibly work around this by giving the ldo0 an explicit name via the
regulator-name property and then look up that property from the phandle and
then obtain a reference to the regulator by calling the normal regulator_get()
and passing the name. That seems wasteful, though, because I already have a
direct link to the regulator (via its struct device_node) and all I really
need is to look up the corresponding struct regulator.
So my question really is if it would be acceptable to add such a helper, or
whether I have completely misunderstood how this works. In the latter case,
could anyone point me in the right direction?
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpktRqusVBwX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
