On 01/03/12 10:27, Stephen Warren wrote: > Russell King wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:45 PM: > ... >> So, really, comparing a standard uImage produced by the standard kernel >> with gzipped Image is far from a fair comparison. And that's actually >> another argument for getting rid of the uImage target... it may make >> people think a bit about what they're doing rather than accepting >> whatever default location someone else chose for their kernel. > > That seems like more of an argument for making the uImage target use > -T kernel_noload unconditionally, rather than removing the target. > Since doing so would solve the issue about the kernel picking a load > address. > > That is, ignoring any arguments about breaking existing workflows at > least... I think this is the case that I was seeing - the current behaviour of the uImage target, of using the zreladdr as the load/start addresses essentially guarantees the worst case relocation behaviour. Regards, Andre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
