On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:01:26PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > In my opinion it makes more sense to introduce a regmap_bulk_write function > for this. regmap_raw_write was not really meant to write registers but This isn't exclusive to that, I think Laxman planned to send a patch doing that on top of this one which would be what most users would end up using. > rather binary blobs, like firmware. Also this keeps things consistent with > the read part of the regmap API. See the previous discussion on this in the past day or so - bulk_write() is more complicated to implement by itself since it's going to end up boling down to a raw_write() internally anyway (as does reg_write()) and it seems nicer to just do the right thing if people ask for it. We can always refactor later to improve performance if needed but this is a simple starting point.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
