On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 02:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM: > >>It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID > >>option before stopping dma. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Tested-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no > >reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing > >an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according > >to HW, that isn't a concern. > > > Olaf, > Can it be applied if it is OK to you? Yep, applied. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
