On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:40:58, Colin Cross wrote: > local_irq_enable() is required by the cpuidle call semantics. See > arch/arm/process.c, it has a WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()) after the > idle function call. The local_irq_disable() can and probably should > be dropped, although a comment that the function is called with > interrupts off and is expected to return with interrupts on would be > helpful. > Ah... I was too fixated on local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable() in cpu_idle(). Thanks for clarifying. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
