> From: linux-pm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-pm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Mark Brown > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 12:24 PM > > is in subsys_initcall_sync() in place of arch_init, although driver is in > > subsys_initcall() to postponed the probe calling. > > > What do you suggest on this case? > > Honestly I'd suggest that you contribute to the effort to get the probe > ordering handling code implemented in mainline. This just seems like a > big can of worms to open up for something that's hopefully just going to > be a short term thing. It's a real problem but this seems fairly niche > and like if we start doing more than we're already doing we're going to > end up running around chasing our own tails on this stuff. I'm really > not sure what the status is on that work, though - it may be that you > actually need to pick the patches up and push them forwards yourself. Completely agree with you. I went through the Grant's change " drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism" and it is discussed in more details here. I will start different thread communication on this issue. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
