On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:39:14AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:19 AM: > > This patch adds the initial device tree for tegra30 > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra.txt > ... > > +* harmony: tegra20 based development board > > +Required root node properties: > > + - compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra20"; > > + > > +* seaboard: tegra20 based clamshell reference design > > +Required root node properties: > > + - compatible = "nvidia,seaboard", "nvidia,tegra20"; > > Do we really want to list all the board names here? In the future, there > could be tens or hundreds. I would argue that we should just document > nvidia,tegra20 and nvidia,tegra30. Agreed. > At a later point, we should fix board-dt.c to solely look for those > compatible values, although this will have to wait until the pinmux DT > bindings are present. Then, the kernel won't care about the board names. Exactly. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
