Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:05 PM: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > v3: ... > This is looking pretty sane to me. > > Grant, how do you prefer to handle this, since it spans of/dt, gpio > and tegra code? I can start a topic branch for Arnd to pull in for the > tegra parts, would you prefer picking up the of helper functions on > your own or is an ack from you and merge through the arm-soc tree > easier? I haven't thought through all the merging details yet, but do be aware of the dependencies this patchset has: 1) Rename of arch/arm/mach-tegra/gpio.c -> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c This is in Grant's gpio for-next branch, and hence linux-next. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's. 2) Various previous Tegra <mach/gpio.h> rework. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's; I assume the same one as (1), but I can't actually find this branch, so can't check. Neither of those is in any Linus release or rc. I *think* that's it. For reference, this patchset was physical written/tested on top of next-20110823, with the patches mentioned in (2) aboe, and some others that hopefully aren't relevant, between linux-next and this patchset. -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
