On Monday 15 August 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > v2: > * Enhanced pinmux code to handle "drive pingroups" as well as "mux > pingroups". This altered the pinmux binding a little; shifting each > type of pingroup into a sub-node in the pinmux node. > * Enumerate pingroups by enumerating DT child nodes, and mapping them to > pingroups, rather than the other way around. Hence also removed > modifications to <linux/of.h> and drivers/of/base.c. > * Included documentation of the bindings. > * Represent pingroup names and function names, as lower case in DT. > * Used a better name for GPIO binding GPIO list. > * Switched to boolean properties for pinmux pull-up/down. > * s/dev_err/dev_dbg/ in DT parsing debug code. > * Various minor cleanups (e.g. typos, white-space). > > This patch modifies Tegra's device tree support to remove the dependency > on harmony_pinmux_init(), thus making it completely board-independent. I don't understand enough of the technical background to comment on the contents, on the surface it all makes sense. I do think that you should keep Linus Walleij on Cc in these emails, since he first started pushing for a common pinmux layer, and we need to make sure that the binding works for all SoCs, not just for tegra. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
