Russell King wrote at Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:36 PM: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:05:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Without this, EINVAL isn't defined, and type bool isn't declared. > > This leads to compilation failures. > > An alternative approach would be to convert tegra to be able to use > the gpiolib __gpio_to_irq() for the on-SoC stuff, and eliminate > irq_to_gpio(). > > Would it be possible to do that instead? That should work too. I posted a couple patches last Friday to remove irq_to_gpio: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/343 https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/5/342 Later in the thread, you said you would merge them into your branch to avoid merge conflicts with the other GPIO work you were doing. For gpio_to_irq, yes, I believe we get rid of it pretty easily; we'd just need to implement gpio-tegra.c's gpio_chip.to_irq function. Should I cook up a patch based on top of linux-next plus the two patches above to do that instead? Thanks. -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
