On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Mark Brown > > This is a step back from the usability of the existing platform data - > > the platform data uses a series of individually named GPIOs while this > > uses an array of GPIO numbers with magic indexes. The fact that you > > need comments explaining what the functions of the array elements are > > is a bit of a red flag here. > Agreed, I had similar concerns with the sdhci bindings where it used a > 3-element array of gpios instead of the previous named ones. I was > told it's common practice to do it that way though? Seems like a step > backwards to me. :( Interesting... what was the reasoning behind this? It's a definite step backwards but it does explain my major concern with the new batch of device tree patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
