Liam Girdwood wrote at Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:12 AM:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:18 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > CONFIG_SND_SOC_TEGRA_WM8903 is useful for many Tegra boards. To avoid the
> > ASoC tegra/Kconfig enumerating them all, instead have the Tegra machine
> > Kconfig select MACH_HAS_SND_SOC_TEGRA_WM8903 where appropriate, and have
> > SND_SOC_TEGRA_WM8903 depend on this.
Colin, Erik, Olof,
Does this change look OK? If so, could you please Ack it; I imagine Mark
is holding off applying it until you do.
After Mark applies this, Tegra for-next needs to merge Mark's tegra
branch, and a few patches I have need to be applied to enable Seaboard
audio, which all needs to happen in the next couple of weeks so it's
in for-next before rc6. I'll send all the details once this change
is applied.
Thanks!
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Mark, this will need to be applied to your tegra branch so it can get
> > merged into both trees. Thanks.
> >
> > v2: s/HAS/WANT/ in Kconfig variable name.
> > I figured a machine "HAVING" a Kconfig variable didn't make much sense.
> > I also wondered about ALLOW/ENABLE.
> > Still, being consistent with existing variable naming is more important
> > that the finer details of English:-)
> >
>
> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxx>
ÿô.nlj·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠË±é¥Šwÿº{.nlj·¥Š{±þׯâ^n‡r¡öë¨è&£ûz¹Þúzf£¢·hšˆ§~††Ûÿÿïÿ‘ê_èæ+v‰¨þ)ßø
