Could anyone review this issue?
Thanks
Wei.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wei Ni
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 6:37 PM
To: rtc-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wei Ni
Subject: [PATCH v9] mfd: tps6586x: add RTC driver for TI TPS6586x
From: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
this driver supports setting of alarms, and
reading/setting of time
Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v9: check the enable_irq_wake/disable_irq_wake return value.
fix these two function's fisrt paremeter, it should use "&pdev->dev"
drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
index b891899..a3944a5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
@@ -335,19 +335,29 @@ static int __devexit tps6586x_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int tps6586x_rtc_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
pm_message_t state)
{
+ int ret;
struct tps6586x_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
- if (device_may_wakeup(pdev))
- enable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+ if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev))
+ ret = enable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+
+ if (ret)
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "enable irq wakeup failed.\n");
+
return 0;
}
static int tps6586x_rtc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ int ret;
struct tps6586x_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
- if (device_may_wakeup(pdev))
- disable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+ if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev))
+ ret = disable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+
+ if (ret)
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "disable irq wakeup failed.\n");
+
return 0;
}
--
1.7.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
