On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Varun Wadekar wrote: > > Thomas, then how do you think we should handle restoring of gpio states > across suspend-resume cycles? That code is unused. Period. No caller, nothing nada. So what does it handle? > > - > > - for (i = INT_GPIO_BASE; i < (INT_GPIO_BASE + TEGRA_NR_GPIOS); i++) { > > - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(i); > > - if (!desc || (desc->status & IRQ_WAKEUP)) > > - continue; > > - enable_irq(i); > > - } And this part is totally unacceptable and should have never been merged. Further it is in the way of cleanups to the core code and as there is no user I'm not willing to even think about what it does and why it is there. FYI, the core code deals with interrupt suspending/resuming already. So if there is a problem with that which does not cover your specific problem, then you better talk to me before hacking up such private workarounds and expecting that I tolerate them in unused code. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html