Mark Brown wrote on Friday, January 21, 2011 11:58 AM: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:51:15AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > Hence, the arch/arm-mach-tegra changes in this patchset (excluding the > > simple standalone addition of that one new header) build on code that > > is neither in ASoC's nor Tegra's for-next branch. Hence, you won't be > > able to carry that patch yourself since it won't apply, even with manual > > merging I suspect. > > So just to be absolutely clear, there really are external dependencies for > the arch/arm bits of this patch series that go beyond the patch series > itself? That's the information I was asking to be flagged on future > submissions. Yes, the arch/arm bits (except that standalone patch to add the new header) depend on a variety of other patches from before this patchset. Those other patches fix a few missing things in the mainline Tegra support and/or simply add platform devices and platform data for the new ASoC driver. At least some of those patches will have to be reworked a little once Tegra's for-next comes on line. The sound/soc bits don't depend on anything except what's already in the ACoC for-2.6.39 branch. -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
