Argh. Yes, the patch snuck into the previous patchset, which is
already applied. So sorry for the churn; I'm trying to maintain about
five different branches here and failed on this one.
Not a big issue; the code is good, just not as separable as it would
ideally be, but I'm extremely sorry to waste your time.
On 10/14/2013 01:36 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:01:01 -0700
Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
usr/bs_rbd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/usr/bs_rbd.c b/usr/bs_rbd.c
index f1dd77d..3abf1cf 100644
--- a/usr/bs_rbd.c
+++ b/usr/bs_rbd.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static void bs_rbd_exit(struct scsi_lu *lu)
struct bs_thread_info *info = BS_THREAD_I(lu);
bs_thread_close(info);
- rados_shutdown(&cluster);
+ rados_shutdown(cluster);
}
I can't apply this. The code is not against the latest?
https://github.com/fujita/tgt/blob/master/usr/bs_rbd.c#L510
The previous patchset fixed the issue and you don't need this patch
any more?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
