Re: WRITE_SAME aio support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Your initiator uses WS10/16 for unmap/discard ?
(i.e. you mount the filesystem using -o discard in the guest)

STGT currently offers "I support unmapping using both WS10 and 16". We
probably should only do this
for backends that supports these operations,  == bs_rdwr.c and not
indicate support for the others.


What we probably need to do here is to make the support for
WRITESAME10/16 with unmap support optional
on whether the backend supports it.
I can look at adding this once I get some other changes in.



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Moussa Ba (moussaba)
<moussaba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am seeing a LOT of WRITE_SAME error messages in the tgt logs. I understand it is not implemented for aio, my question is will this affect array performance . We are using tgt to host datastores for a virtualization workload.
>
>
> tgtd: bs_aio_cmd_submit(211) WRITE_SAME not yet supported for AIO backend
>
>
> Moussa
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux