On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:24:47 -0700 Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/15/2013 10:32 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:43:58 -0700 >> Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 07/15/2013 04:40 PM, Dan Mick wrote: >>>> tgtadm rejects tid 0. > >> Some existing code (e.g. under scripts/) might depend on the above >> behavior. So I don't like to change unless we have to change. > > If there are tests that depend on it, those tests aren't sufficiently > generic; if there's support code that does, that support code is also > broken. Do you know of anything specifically? I can investigate/run > tests. I meant that there might be some in-house broken code that depends on the behavior. So I like to avoid to change the behavoir. > This is a big surprise for new users and shouldn't be a limitation; > even if it must be, the error has to be better than "tid must be > supplied". Agreed with the error. Can you send a patch to improve the error message? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
