Re: [PATCH] Add support for WRITEVERIFY10/12/16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:54 PM, ronnie sahlberg
<ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:20 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:30:40 +1000
>> ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> From 7717d0bdaaf1f37943f659390cf20179c6e3c9ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:28:26 +1000
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Add support for WRITEVERIFY10/12/16
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  usr/bs_rdwr.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
>>>  usr/sbc.c     |   20 ++++++++++----------
>>>  usr/scsi.c    |    4 +++-
>>>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> @@ -417,12 +423,6 @@ static int sbc_verify(int host_no, struct scsi_cmd *cmd)
>>>               goto sense;
>>>       }
>>>
>>> -     bytchk = cmd->scb[1] & 0x02;
>>> -     if (!bytchk) {
>>> -             /* no data compare with the media */
>>> -             return SAM_STAT_GOOD;
>>> -     }
>>> -
>>
>> What's this change for?
>
> There is no BYTCHK flag in WRITEVERIFY*
> WRITEVERIFY* will always perform a compare to the data.
> Thats why the check is removed from WRITEVERIFY.


So the check is moved down into the bs_rdwr() backend instead. And
there it is only triggered for VERIFY*  commands
but not for WRITEVERIFY* commands
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux