Re: [BUG] Tgt-1.0.8 exited unexpectedly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:05:05 +0900 (JST)
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I want VastSky which is a cluster storage system to use TGT as its

Interesting. There are some similar experiments. IBM does the similar
and I also did the similar with OpenStack. RedHat Hail does the
similar with their own iSCSI target implementation.

Out of curiosity, can VastSky avoid reading the old data?

For example, WRITE goes to the three replica nodes, then WRITE to the
same sector fails on the first replica node (e.g. timeout because the
node is too busy) but succeeds with the rest two nodes (so the two
nodes have the newer data).

Then if the two nodes having the new data are down, is it possible
that an initiator gets the old data from the first node (when the
initiator issues READ to the same sector)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux