On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > I updated the Linux SCSI targets comparison page > http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html, which compares features of > the existing Linux SCSI target subsystems. The comparison includes SCST, > STGT, IET and LIO. I added IET there, because it is the most used Linux > iSCSI target at the moment. . . > > If you see I'm wrong somewhere or forgot something, you are welcome to > correct me and I will fix that. > > Vlad > as a user following the potential inclusion of a kernel-space target, iscsi specifically, I would be very interested in seeing what other pluses the other frameworks have over scst, because if this chart is accurate, all the other targets have quite a ways to go to catch up. To me, lacking correct reserve and task management means "not ready for public consumption". Making any kernel change that does not have RESERVE/RELEASE and full TM command support is only going to make Linux look buggy and amateur-ish in the storage world. Best to not change anything than to implement something without them. These 2 features alone are what helped me choose SCST in the first place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
