Re: [PATCH] RFC prevent tgtd from segfault when attempting to configure passthrough device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:21:22 +1000
Mark Harvey <markh794@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:44:05 +1000
> > Mark Harvey <markh794@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> This was one way to resolve the segfault if .cmd_passthrough() is NULL
> >>
> >>
> >> From cd9c358476090d1a1758aba03157c30e60c53e57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Mark Harvey <markh794@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 06:48:02 +1000
> >> Subject: Prevent segfault if passthrough params not correct.
> >>
> >> If user neglects to supply '--device_type=pt' when creating a
> >> passthrough device, tgtd would segfault due to .cmd_passthrough() being NULL
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Harvey <markh794@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  usr/bs_sg.c |    8 ++++++++
> >>  usr/mmc.c   |    1 +
> >>  usr/osd.c   |    1 +
> >>  usr/sbc.c   |    1 +
> >>  usr/scc.c   |    6 ++++++
> >>  usr/smc.c   |    1 +
> >>  usr/ssc.c   |    2 +-
> >>  usr/tgtd.h  |    1 +
> >>  8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>     
> >
> > Better to check this earlier (that is, when we create a new device)?
> >
> > How about something like this (not tested)?
> >
> > =
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] check pt device creation
> >
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  usr/target.c |    7 +++++++
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/usr/target.c b/usr/target.c
> > index 5fbfb0e..bb5b0c8 100644
> > --- a/usr/target.c
> > +++ b/usr/target.c
> > @@ -490,6 +490,13 @@ int tgt_device_create(int tid, int dev_type, uint64_t lun, char *params,
> >  	} else
> >  		bst = get_backingstore_template("null");
> >  
> > +	if ((!strncmp(bst->bs_name, "bsg", 3) ||
> > +	     !strncmp(bst->bs_name, "sg", 2)) &&
> > +	    dev_type != TYPE_PT) {
> > +		ret = TGTADM_INVALID_REQUEST;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	lu_bsoflags = str_to_open_flags(bsoflags);
> >  	if (lu_bsoflags == -1) {
> >  		ret = TGTADM_INVALID_REQUEST;
> >   
> 
> Tested & confirmed this patch works for me as well.

Applied, thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux