On 06/07/2010 02:07 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 13:35 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 06/07/2010 12:37 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 12:27 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/2010 12:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 11:40 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/07/2010 06:50 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch adds initial support for the block layer implementation of the sg v4 interface
>>>>>>> (BSG) -> STGT with a new struct backingstore_template bsg_bst sharing code with the
>>>>>>> original sg_bst. It adds for new function bs_bsg_cmd_submit() for incoming write I/O
>>>>>>> and bs_bsg_cmd_complete() for polling read I/O using include/linux/bsg.h:struct sg_io_v4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch also splits up bs_sg_open() to support both BSG and SG looking for the
>>>>>>> path "/dev/bsg" in bs_sg_open(), and getting max_queue using SG_GET_COMMAND_Q and
>>>>>>> calling SG_SET_RESERVED_SIZE (following the original bs_sg code in init_sg_device)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also chk_bsg_device() currently using a hardcoded 254 major as def for BSG does not
>>>>>>> appear in include/linux/major.h just yet..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far this has been tested with STGT/iSCSI <-> BSG <-> TCM_Loop SPC-4 iSCSI Target
>>>>>>> Port emulation and is able to mkfs, fsck and mount a filesystem from a TCM/IBLOCK
>>>>>>> Linux LVM kernel level backstore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> usr/bs_sg.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>> usr/scsi_cmnd.h | 7 ++
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/usr/bs_sg.c b/usr/bs_sg.c
>>>>>>> index 23676ef..d071714 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/usr/bs_sg.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/usr/bs_sg.c
>>>>>
>>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +static int bs_bsg_cmd_submit(struct scsi_cmd *cmd)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct scsi_lu *dev = cmd->dev;
>>>>>>> + int fd = dev->fd;
>>>>>>> + struct sg_io_v4 *io_hdr = &cmd->cmd_bsg_hdr;
>>>>>>> + int err = 0;
>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>> + * Following linux/include/linux/bsg.h
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + /* [i] 'Q' to differentiate from v3 */
>>>>>>> + io_hdr->guard = 'Q';
>>>>>>> + io_hdr->protocol = BSG_PROTOCOL_SCSI;
>>>>>>> + io_hdr->subprotocol = BSG_SUB_PROTOCOL_SCSI_CMD;
>>>>>>> + io_hdr->request_len = cmd->scb_len;
>>>>>>> + io_hdr->request = (unsigned long )cmd->scb;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (scsi_get_data_dir(cmd) == DATA_WRITE) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why the if? both sides are fully bidi just remove the ifs
>>>>>> and: OUT <= OUT, IN <= IN
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Whoops, thanks for pointing this one out (again). Tested with
>>>>> unidirection commands and included into my local tgt.git/pass that I
>>>>> will send along to Tomo-san..
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, I still need to sort out BIDI support for TCM_Loop at some point in
>>>>> the not too distant future. What would be a good way to generate BIDI
>>>>> traffic into STGT or a local SCSI LLD..?
>>>>
>>>> scsi_debug has some emulation for XOR commands, does that help?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great, thanks for the pointer on the LLD side. Is there any userspace
>>> code around that will generate XDWRITEREAD_* CDBs for bulk I/O or do I
>>> need to code this part myself..?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> --nab
>>>
>>
>> You could use iscsi as LLD and generate OSD heavy traffic. (With a real osd_tgtd
>> on the end side). But that will need more work, right?
>
> Hmmm, suppose I need to read up a bit on how to generate osd_tgtd
> traffic..
>
Generating is easy, there is the exofs filke system that given an osd
will export a VFS filesystem over it. but...
>> what does the TCM_Loop
>> do exactly. Please forgive my laziness, I never took the time to find out.
>>
>
> TCM_Loop is a TCM fabric module that appears under /sys/kernel/config/target/loopback/
> that emulates SAS, FC and iSCSI WWPN Ports and their assocated I_T Nexus
> for SPC-4 PR and ALUA operations. TCM_Loop registers as a Linux/SCSI
> LLD (a la scsi_debug) that presents TCM backstores (IBLOCK, FILEIO,
> RAMDISK) as a local struct scsi_device with a complete set of WWN port
> naming identifiers (sg_inq -i) and TransportIDs (for PR).
>
> With TCM v4 code in lio-core-2.6.git/lio-4.0, TCM_Loop has been
> converted along with the rest of the v4.x fabric modules to use a
> generic set of struct config_group logic from
> drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c. There is a bit of
> information on the wiki at:
>
> http://linux-iscsi.org/index.php/TCM_loop
>
> but as you will notice the screenshots are still referencing the
> original tests from last year with VMware Workstation. Things have
> changed quite a bit since then as TCM_Loop has gone from using internal
> SAS WWPN+Nexus emulation to providing multi-protocol support based on
> configfs provided WWPNs using the new generic naming handers from
> drivers/target/target_core_fabric_lib.c
>
OK, so from what I understand, from a SCSI stack perspective it is the lowest
end target, using the local machine's backing store.
That will not help at all with OSD. With osd_tgtd (In user mode) we use the iscsi
protocol driver, but define a new disk-type, "osd" and a new backing-store "osdemu"
which does a complete OSD-CDB decoding and implementation. Current code is not good
for you because it's heavily user-mode dependent including an sqlite3 DB for storing
attributes.
Cheers
Boaz
> Best,
>
> --nab
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
