FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Not session (nexus) dedicated thread. The patch creates one pthread per target. understood > I set up four targets. Each target has one logical unit (one SSD drive). > I think that the patch would not improve the performance of one target > having four logical units. Can't we tell people to use multiple > targets if they want performance? yes, people can follow this model of multiple targets. As I wrote before, as it can help to outsmart per session bottlenecks / take advantage of parallelism in both sides. > I thought about pthread per nexus, pthread per connection, etc. Any > plan to improve the performance without adding hug lock complexity works for me. indeed such an approach would add locking when going to the backing store in case a target has multiple sessions, e.g multiple readers of the same lun. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
