On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:06:26 -0700 Steven Wertheimer <steven.wertheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As I said, I have not instrumented tgtd, but it seems pretty clear that > one tgtd process becomes CPU-bound and is unable to do enough > local I/O to saturate all of the disks. I'm happy to instrument and re-run > if that would help. Can you get better numbers if you increase NR_WORKER_THREADS like this? diff --git a/usr/bs_thread.h b/usr/bs_thread.h index 9dfbbd5..3640da2 100644 --- a/usr/bs_thread.h +++ b/usr/bs_thread.h @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#define NR_WORKER_THREADS 4 +#define NR_WORKER_THREADS 16 typedef void (request_func_t) (struct scsi_cmd *); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
