Re: [PATCH RFC] support multiple target instances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:29:18 +1100
ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The part of the patch where we control the management channel seems to
> have been lost/forgotten.
> 
> Please find a patch attached that contains an updated version Or's
> patch for specifying the management channel
> to allow us to run multiple instances of tgtd concurrently.
> 
> This can be useful in testing since on very powerful machines, the
> single thread for the eventloop reaches 100% of one core, this caps
> performance.

adding specifying management port support is fine by me, as I said
before, I don't fancy running multiple tgtd though.

I have two comments:

1. We already have long options like "initiator-address" so I like
clear long options. Something like 'management-port' or 'control-port'
instead of 'mgmt-port'?

2. Is it better to have the same short option for tgtd and tgtadm?


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux