Re: [PATCH] Build process makeover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:29:43 +0200
Florian Haas <florian.haas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Can't we avoid putting version-stamp file in tarballs (e.g. Can we set
> > the proper VERSION in Makefile)?
> 
> I hate the idea of sed'ing around in a Makefile. The .include
> version-stamp magic was the best thing I could think of. If you have a
> better suggestion, then please do share.

Well, I've never seen any software including something such as
a version-stamp file.

I've seen lots of software putting version strings in .h or
Makefile. It's quite common.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux