On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Florian Haas <florian.haas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/30/2009 12:05 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:21:18 +0200 >> Florian Haas <florian.haas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Tomo-san, Mike, >>> >>> I am submitting a humble proposal for a makeover of the build system, in >>> an effort to "clean up" a bit before a 1.0 release which is probably set >>> to happen soon. >> >> I'd like to release 1.0 after implementing persistent reservation. > > Is there an ETA on this? Unfortunately not (persistent reservation - that is).. Every time I 'appear' to have time to continue work on this, other commitments seem to crop up.. > >>> My motivation for this is to facilitate RPM builds. I understand that >>> you are not inclined to include an RPM spec in the tgt tree yourself, >>> however I would ask you to please pull the other patches into the tree >>> if you find them useful. >> >> Please just send patches. Reviewing changes via web is not easy at >> all. > > Well since they Makefiles have been almost completely rewritten, I > figured reviewing the whole file would be easier than going through > diffs. Nonetheless, I'm sending all three, even though you're probably > not interested in the third one (the spec file). > >> From a quick look, I don't think that changing Makefile to install the >> init script is good because that such Makefile doesn't work nicely for >> other distributions such as debian. > > Care to elaborate? Since when does Debian not use init scripts? Plus, if > one wanted to use tgt on Debian (in a sensible fashion), one would > require a build system for Debian packaging (read: debian/rules, > debian/control etc.) anyhow, and that currently does not exist. So I > don't see your point. > > Cheers, > Florian > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
