On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:07:24 +0300 > Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> > I know that but it doesn't sound good to me. How can you handle isns_port? >> > tgtd --port=3260 --iscsi=isns-port=1000 >> > tgtd --iscsi=iscsi-port=3260,isns-port=1000 >> > The latter looks more consistent to me. >> >> I am fine with both approaches > > Everyone, other opinions? > I think it would make more sense to separate the port specified for the mgmt channel from the iscsi related ports. since it may be desireable to also run multiple instances of tgtd for fcoe as well and then --iscsi-port would not make sense. So I think it would be better with --port=1234 --iscsi=iscsi-port=3260,isns-port=1000 Or even better : --port=1234 --iscsi-portal=10.0.0.1 --iscsi-port=3260 --isns-port=1000 Where --port only refers to the mgmt socket, which is unique for each instance of tgtd. regards ronnie sahlberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
