Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2009, 16:10 +0900 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:57:44 +0200 > Arne Redlich <arne.redlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2009, 08:06 +0900 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori: > > > > > > But if an initiator doesn't configure MaxBurstLength, we use the > > > default value, 256K, which is smaller than what we use now (512K). > > > > Yes, but the target still cannot override it: if an initiator doesn't > > explicitly propose MaxBurstLength the target must either use the default > > value from the spec or explicitly propose another one. The initiator > > could then agree on that value. > > > > I have no idea if there are implementations that go to this level of > > complexity (any input welcome!). Though I don't have any data to back > > that up, my guess would be that initiator implementations will then just > > reply with the default value anyway. > > Hmm, I think tgt proposes a parameter value if it is different from > the default in the spec, and open-iscsi can handle it. > > IET can do that too, I think. Yes, the proposal part at the target works, I just wasn't sure whether initiators would accept such a proposal or just reply with the default. Arne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
