Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/14/2009 03:07 PM wrote:
Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:

Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system?

Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If so, you should try with CFQ as well.
I used CFQ.
You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt.

I didn't apply this one.

I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to 2.6.26.8 kernel (perhaps in a trivial way, I didn't check).

Yes, io_context patch for 2.6.26.x kernels doesn't exist, because it isn't clear if it has the necessary functionality.

But it's worth for you to upgrade to 2.6.27.x. Have you seen http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt?

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux