FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > Your logic is completely crazy to me. I will not merge your work if > you don't change your way. > This is your prerogative, in which case I will have to make my decisions. >> But there's never been a problem. This code works for years just fine. >> The problem at hand is BSD compatibility. As I said changes should be >> separate, cleanups is one thing, BSD code another. Most of the patches >> are BSD only stuff why can't they go in, they do nothing to the code. > > The logic is broken. Working code doesn't mean that we don't need to > improve it. > I never said that, I was talking about how to improve it, you answer to things I never said, perhaps you misunderstood. > >>>> Mean while I'm using my tree, and so will my users >>> Drop such attitude; my code works for my users. I don't care about >>> your users. I care about only tgt. >> No! you drop your attitude. These are your users, hell I'm your user. >> I came with a problem, BSD. Now you queue me behind bureaucracy and >> second grade users. But there is one philosophical question you must >> answer: where was this problem before I came with BSD code? > > See above. Working code doesn't mean that there is no room to improve. Again you misunderstood, that was a rhetorical question which meant: There is a cause an effect and we should look at the cause of events to actually understand the effects. Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
