On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:55:57 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > emulate semtimedop with plain semop on bsd > > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > usr/log.c | 1 + > usr/os.h | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/usr/log.c b/usr/log.c > index 056314a..9154626 100644 > --- a/usr/log.c > +++ b/usr/log.c > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #include <sys/types.h> > #include <sys/wait.h> > > +#include "os.h" > #include "log.h" > > #define SEMKEY 0xA7L > diff --git a/usr/os.h b/usr/os.h > index 9908bb5..77944b3 100644 > --- a/usr/os.h > +++ b/usr/os.h > @@ -22,4 +22,9 @@ struct sockaddr_storage; > int os_getnameinfo_ss(struct sockaddr_storage *ss, char *host, size_t hostlen, > char *serv, size_t servlen, int flags); > > +#ifdef __MAKE_TGT_ON_BSD__ > +#define semtimedop(semid, sops, nsops, timeout) \ > + semop(semid, sops, nsops) > +#endif BSDes don't have semtimedop? We can't sleep so we use semtimedop. This emulation is broken, but it's fine by me for now. But I don't like ifdef. Why not be consistent with other portability code, just creating do_semtimedop or something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
