Re: [PATCH] check for valid parameters when passing tgtadm commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please ignore my earlier email.

I just pulled from git and found updates to tgtadm.

I'll retest and post after testing latest code.

Cheers
Mark


FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:17:13 +0200
Doron Shoham <dorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yeah, we do in most generally though there are some exceptions. Leave
parts in which you think that breaking 80 character rule is better.
check for valid parameters when passing tgtadm commands

Signed-off-by: Doron Shoham <dorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 usr/tgtadm.c |  176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Looks nice. Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Clusters]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux