On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:21:41 +0300 Doron Shoham <dorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:39:24 +0300 > > Doron Shoham <dorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> deny allocation of a device which > >> which mounted on the same device as rootfs. > >> also deny the allocation of swap devices. > >> add --allow-mounted flag for overriding this. > > > > Do we really need a new option? Using the --force option is better for > > me. > > As I understand, --force option has a different rule when using it with --execute. > > "The patch also changes the behaviour of --execute slightly - it now > tries to delete the targets which are not in the config file; if the > target is in use, it won't be touched (unless --force is used); if the > target is not in use, it will be deleted." > > So if we use it for allow-mounted also it can be ambiguous. Hmm, for me, the force option always means that we do things that we don't do by default and just give warning of. For your change, without '--force', if an user tries to use a mounted device, the tool gives warning of it and ignores the device. With '--force', the tool uses any device even if it's mounted. For me, it's pretty consistent. Anyone? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
