On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:18:45PM +0100, Kees Bakker wrote:
> Op 07-02-2025 om 16:04 schreef Gaston Gonzalez:
> > Remove unused variable 'retval' in function 'tnt4882_update_status'
> >
> > This change removes the following warning:
> >
> > warning: variable ‘retval’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gaston Gonzalez <gascoar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/tnt4882_gpib.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/tnt4882_gpib.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/tnt4882_gpib.c
> > index 2e1c3cbebaca..a681bf559b46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/tnt4882_gpib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/tnt4882/tnt4882_gpib.c
> > @@ -704,12 +704,10 @@ static unsigned int tnt4882_update_status(gpib_board_t *board, unsigned int clea
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > u8 line_status;
> > - unsigned int retval;
> > struct tnt4882_priv *priv = board->private_data;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&board->spinlock, flags);
> > board->status &= ~clear_mask;
> > - retval = nec7210_update_status_nolock(board, &priv->nec7210_priv);
> You cannot remove a function call just like that. At least, not without
> describing that
> it is OK to do so.
> > /* set / clear SRQ state since it is not cleared by interrupt */
> > line_status = tnt_readb(priv, BSR);
> > if (line_status & BCSR_SRQ_BIT)
>
You are obviously right on this one too. I'll look into this one more
carefully and I'll send a v2.
Regards,
Gaston
