Hello Laurentiu,
On 2024-12-19 17:06:40 +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is in preparation for bringing our downstream max96724 work into
> the max96712 driver. The changes in this patch-set are mainly cosmetic
> to increase readability, with one exception related to the PCLK debug
> register which appears to exist in MAX96724 as well(see VPG section in
> users guide [1]).
>
> Unfortunately, I couldn't find any max96712 reference manual anywhere to
> make sure the registers match between the 2 chips, nor I have a max96712
> to test with.
I have tested this series with both MAX96712 and MAX96724 and I can
capture the test patterns correctly. For the series,
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> However, since the max96724 compatible was added here, according to the
> commit
>
> 6c872b782ae ("media: staging: max96712: Add support for MAX96724")
>
> the chips are "almost identical". So, I used max96724 register and
> field descriptions instead. Someone with a max96712 RM may want to
> double-check though.
>
> Thanks,
> Laurentiu
>
> [1] https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/user-guides/max96724fr-user-guide.pdf
>
> Laurentiu Palcu (3):
> staging: media: max96712: fix typo
> staging: media: max96712: enable extra debug register for max96724
> staging: media: max96712: add some register and field definitions
>
> drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c | 210 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.44.1
>
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
