On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 08:52:08AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Günter, > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 5:18 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The underlying problem is that the code uses a pointer to store the physical > > address. That doesn't work if sizeof(pointer) < sizeof(physical address), > > which affects systems with X86_PAE enabled. I have not seen the problem > > anywhere else. > > I could reproduce the build issue on ARM, with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, > which is not enabled by allmodconfig. So does that mean this patch is incorrect? confused, greg k-h
