On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:33:36PM -0300, Rodrigo Gobbi wrote: > > The commit message should answer any kind of reasonable questions > > a review is probably going to ask but it doesn't give any information on > > this. > > I'll try to improve this for future patches, tks for pointing that out. > > > This commit would easier to review if it were broken up in a different > > way. > > Ok, in that way, a patch series is the best approach here, right? I'm not your boss, right? And I can't tell you what to do and what I'm suggesting is more work. If you just want to send patch 1 from the series instead of all three patches, that's fine. No one is going to be annoyed by that. In patch 1, you would only delete code which is obviously surrounded by #ifdef DBG_RX_SIGNAL_DISPLAY_RAW_DATA so the case statement would look like: case HAL_DEF_DBG_RX_INFO_DUMP: break; It's basically the same as what you wrote but slightly smaller and easier to review. But yeah, we're not going to merge this as-is. > Despite the changes in the series being dependent on each other in this case. Yep. Patchsets are generally dependent on each other. The rule is that each patch has to make sense on its own. You can't break the build. But they work on top of each other and they're applied in order. regards, dan carpenter
