On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 08:10:55AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 05:27:53AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > The following changes since commit 8cf0b93919e13d1e8d4466eb4080a4c4d9d66d7b: > > > > Linux 6.12-rc2 (2024-10-06 15:32:27 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git tags/staging-6.13-rc1 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 114eae3c9fde35220cca623840817a740a2eb7b3: > > > > Staging: gpib: gpib_os.c - Remove unnecessary OOM message (2024-11-10 08:04:18 +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > [ ...] > > > Dave Penkler (33): > > staging: gpib: Add common include files for GPIB drivers > > staging: gpib: Add user api include files > > staging: gpib: Add GPIB common core driver > > staging: gpib: Add tms9914 GPIB chip driver > > staging: gpib: Add nec7210 GPIB chip driver > > staging: gpib: Add HP/Agilent/Keysight 8235xx PCI GPIB driver > > staging: gpib: Add Agilent/Keysight 82357x USB GPIB driver > > staging: gpib: Add Computer Boards GPIB driver > > I seem to be unable to find the patch introducing the problem (the link > provided with the patch is invalid), so I report it here. > > With i386 allmodconfig builds: > > Building i386:allyesconfig ... failed > -------------- > Error log: > drivers/staging/gpib/cec/cec_gpib.c: In function 'cec_pci_attach': > drivers/staging/gpib/cec/cec_gpib.c:300:28: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] > 300 | nec_priv->iobase = (void *)(pci_resource_start(cec_priv->pci_device, 3)); > | ^ > drivers/staging/gpib/ines/ines_gpib.c: In function 'ines_common_pci_attach': > drivers/staging/gpib/ines/ines_gpib.c:783:28: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] > 783 | nec_priv->iobase = (void *)(pci_resource_start(ines_priv->pci_device, > | ^ > > pci_resource_start() returns resource_size_t, which is not a pointer, and thus > can not be cast to one. This is odd, why hasn't 0-day or any other build testing found this? I'll dig into it on Monday, thanks for this. greg k-h
