On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 05:08:22PM -0300, Rodrigo Gobbi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > As noticed at [1], hal_com.c is not compiling with -DDBG_RX_SIGNAL_DISPLAY_RAW_DATA due > the changes at [2] (a few statements were not replaced with the new struct). > A little discussion was made at [1] too about how useful this cflag was or if the > code under the cflag should be deleted. I think there is no harm to keep those things > as is since we can easily fix the error. > Tks and regards. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/f61d8272-4af3-40d6-a333-e7731c3fc5ae@stanley.mountain/T/#mffa281a89e67c609db9b125878d5b8d090776812 > [2] "staging: rtl8723bs: Rework 'struct _ODM_Phy_Status_Info_' coding style.", commit ec57f8641fbca07bbb61a75bd4760fd7aef86860 > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c > index 95fb38283c58..63bf6f034f61 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c > @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ void rtw_store_phy_info(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *prframe) > struct hal_com_data *pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter); > struct rx_pkt_attrib *pattrib = &prframe->u.hdr.attrib; > > - struct odm_phy_info *pPhyInfo = (PODM_PHY_INFO_T)(&pattrib->phy_info); > + struct odm_phy_info *pPhyInfo = (struct odm_phy_info *)(&pattrib->phy_info); > struct rx_raw_rssi *psample_pkt_rssi = &padapter->recvpriv.raw_rssi_info; > > psample_pkt_rssi->data_rate = pattrib->data_rate; > @@ -919,8 +919,8 @@ void rtw_store_phy_info(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *prframe) > psample_pkt_rssi->mimo_signal_strength[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_strength[rf_path]; > psample_pkt_rssi->mimo_signal_quality[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_quality[rf_path]; > if (!isCCKrate) { > - psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_pwr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->RxPwr[rf_path]; > - psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_snr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->RxSNR[rf_path]; > + psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_pwr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_pwr[rf_path]; > + psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_snr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_snr[rf_path]; > } > } > } > -- > 2.47.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
